A powerful sentiment that the planned Super League expansion is simply “not being done properly” is driving a last-minute challenge from concerned clubs. The push to a 14-team format, approved just months ago, is now plagued by doubts and dissent amid accusations that the process has been rushed and lacks the financial rigour necessary to protect the sport’s future.
The core of the dissent is a perceived failure of governance by the Rugby Football League (RFL). Clubs report being asked to make a monumental decision without access to crucial information, specifically a detailed financial model. This lack of transparency has fostered a climate of mistrust, leading to a strong push to delay the expansion until 2027 to allow for a more measured and analytical approach.
Financial sustainability is the key worry. The league’s primary broadcast partner, Sky Sports, has not only declined to increase its rights fee to cover additional teams but is also reportedly opposed to the idea altogether. With the current £21.5m annual deal expiring next season, clubs are acutely aware that alienating their broadcaster could lead to a catastrophic drop in revenue, impacting every team in the league.
The speed of the process is another major concern. The RFL is attempting to complete the expansion in a few short months, a timeline that critics say is wholly inadequate for such a significant undertaking. The panel charged with selecting new teams is under immense pressure, and there are fears that the vetting of applicants will not be thorough enough, posing a risk to the integrity and stability of the competition.
While the RFL has defended the process, pointing to a decisive vote in July, the subsequent emergence of widespread concern suggests many clubs are now reconsidering their support. The situation has become a test of the RFL’s leadership, as it must now address the legitimate concerns of its members or risk forcing through a divisive plan that many believe is a reckless gamble with the future of rugby league.